Have your say

You can provide your input in two ways:

  1. Upload a document or media
  2. Respond to our questions using the form below

Please specify in the answer field below if you do not want this submission to be published. 

Once you have uploaded a file or completed the questions, press submit at the bottom of the page. 

For more information on making a submission, including publication, confidentiality and privacy considerations, please see here

Upload a file

Maximum file size 8 MB.
We can only accept one file per submission. If you wish to provide multiple files, please make an additional submission.
Allowed types: jpg docx pdf.

Answer questions

Do you have any feedback specific to the draft Safety Management System (SMS) Standard or the accompanying Schedule 1 – SMS Evidence Requirements?
Do you have any feedback specific to the draft Ministerial Guidelines for Heavy Vehicle Accreditation?
Do you have any feedback specific to the draft National Audit Standard (NAS)?
Do you have any feedback specific to the draft Ministerial Standard for Alternative Compliance Hours? 

With respect to the Ministerial Standard for Alternative Compliance Hours — particularly Section 4 (b)(i) — the policy intent is that a driver or operator cannot plan a trip around a split-rest provision (i.e. it is not permitted to identify places to rest and rest durations based on the driver utilising split rest). Trip planning must be done on the basis that a driver is not using split rest.

The NTC seeks comment as to whether this policy intent is accurately reflected in the current draft.

With respect to the Ministerial Standard for Alternative Compliance Hours — particularly Section 4  — it has been suggested that split rest provisions should be subject to a requirement that the total of the individual split rests should be a minimum of 8 hours (similar to the current s255, Defence for solo drivers operating under BFM) e.g. a 5/2 or 6/1 split rest provision would not be permitted as they total less than 8 hours. 

The NTC is seeking comment on this proposal.
 

With respect to the Ministerial Standard for Alternative Compliance Hours — transparency of decision making by the Regulator is recognised as important, but the NTC considers that this is best addressed through the Statement of Expectations issued to the Regulator by Ministers, rather than within a Standard. 

The NTC is seeking comment on this proposal.

With respect to the Ministerial Standard for Alternative Compliance Hours — transparency of decision making by the Regulator is recognised as important, but the NTC considers that this is best addressed through the Statement of Expectations issued to the Regulator by Ministers, rather than within a Standard. 

The NTC is seeking comment on this proposal.

Do you have any other feedback on the statutory instruments?
If you are submitting as an individual rather than on behalf of an organisation, please leave the field below blank