Have your say

To provide your submission to the NTC:

  1. Review how we manage submissions on this page.
  2. Upload a document or provide your response in the forms below.

Publication and use of submissions

Unless selected otherwise, submissions may be published on the NTC website and may remain publicly accessible indefinitely.

Our privacy policy outlines how and what information we collect. For further information on the publication and use of submissions, please see our submission process and policy page.

 

Publication and confidentiality

Public

  • If you want to make a public submission, you can choose a published name (including a pseudonym) that will appear with your response on our website. This can be your name or your organisation’s name.

Public (name withheld)

  • If you want to make a submission but do not want your name made public when we publish the submission, the NTC will publish the submission but not who made it and note ‘name withheld’. Your name and/or organisation will not be directly referenced in any published materials or documents prepared by the NTC.

Confidential

  • If you want your response to be private and confidential, your response will not be published on the website or in documents prepared by the NTC. However, a confidential submission may be referenced in documents prepared by us. Where only certain sections of a submission are considered ‘in confidence’, you may prefer to select Public or Public (name withheld), and mark relevant sections ‘IN CONFIDENCE’. Those sections will be withheld from publication, and the remainder of the submission will be published.
Please indicate how you would like your submission to be treated.
I consent to my submission and nominated published name being made public.
I consent to my submission being published, but not my name (whether individual or organisation).
I do not consent to my submission being published.
Public submissions

About the submitter

You may provide your real name, use a pseudonym, or submit anonymously. If you do not provide contact details, the NTC may be unable to follow up if needing to clarify your feeedback or comments.

If you selected ‘Public’ above as your publication preference, the 'Organisation' field below will be used as the published name attributed to your submission. If you are submitting as an individual rather than on behalf of an organisation, please leave this field blank. Your entered name will then be displayed when the submission is published.

If you are submitting as an individual rather than on behalf of an organisation, please leave the field below blank

Upload a file

Maximum file size 8 MB.
We can only accept one file per submission. If you wish to provide multiple files, please make an additional submission.
Allowed types: jpg docx pdf.

Or answer questions within the C-RIS below.

How important is the aim of reducing the volatility of heavy vehicle charges?
Do you support the transition to the forward-looking cost base method?
Are there other issues that need to be considered when ITMM decides whether to adopt the forward-looking cost base to set heavy vehicle charges in the future?
Do you agree with the expenditure categories? If not, please outline your preferred approach.
Do the current expenditure categories allow for a fair estimate of the collective asset lives with each category?
Do you prefer using a rate of return based on the Australian Government 10-year bond rate or a blended rate in the FLCB model? What reasons is your preference based on?
Do you agree with the proposed treatment of toll roads and non-standard financing projects? If not, please outline your preferred approach.
Do you agree with the use of ABS’ Government Financial Statistics data to forecast the local government road expenditure for the FLCB model? If not, provide details of your preferred source for government road expenditure.
Do you agree with the local government road expenditure forecasting methodology? If not, outline your preferred methodology.
Do you agree with allocating local government road expenditure to FLCB asset and expenditure categories via jurisdictional category expenditure over each year of the three-year regulatory period?
Do you agree with the proposed approach regarding hybrid and electric heavy vehicles? If not, what is your preferred approach and what information should this approach be based on?
Do you agree that, if possible, year-to-year adjustments to the regulatory portion of heavy vehicle registration charges should be implemented through an automatic adjustment mechanism in the Heavy Vehicle Charges Model Law?
Do you have any comments on the sensitivity analysis?
Are there any other sensitivity analyses that should be considered?
Do you support using the sum-of-the-years digits method for depreciating the initial RAB? If not, are you aware of an alternative methodology that would provide a low value for depreciation of the initial RAB in the final year?
Do you support adopting a 20-year lifespan for the initial RAB? If not, what lifespan would you prefer, and for what reasons?
Do you agree with the proposed information publication measures and how its outputs are used to advise governments on setting heavy vehicle charges from time to time?
Is there other information that should be published?
Do you support the broad approach to communication surrounding expenditure forecasts? If not, what other approach should be considered?
Do you support any of the four options as presented? Outline the reasons for your preference.
Are there any alternative options not included in this C-RIS that should be explored? Outline why this alternative option is preferred to the ones included in this C-RIS.