Submission data

View the feedback we have received on the NTC Consultation RIS - Barriers to the safe use of personal mobility devices paper.

Upload a file

Answer questions

Appropriate
No comment
Support restrictions for younger users.
No comment
Perhaps upcoming future technology could have been included - eg. delivery robots. Broader benefits of alternative transport modes are often neglected - eg. community health benefits, congestion benefits.
I feel that Australian cities are built for motor vehicles. As our cities grow, we must adjust our infrastructure to adapt to new forms of transport. I do not think it is reasonable to expect a bike lane to be built on every street, so different modes of transport must be able to co-exist. I think that there is too much road space currently allocated for parking, and we must move towards reallocating road space for community use and provisioning it for people walking and other smaller forms of transport. If footpaths were wider, there would more space to safely allow for different uses (bins, seating, mobility devices, people walking).
a) I agree with 10km/hr as the current standard on shared paths. Any slower and balancing will become an issue for bicycles and likely other devices.
b) bicycle areas - I support 25km/hr as the current standard for ebikes.
c) roads - road specific speed limit, although, more high pedestrian areas should be reduced to 30km/h.
Yes, I support that decision.