Submission data | National Transport Commission

View the feedback we have received on the NTC Consultation RIS - Barriers to the safe use of personal mobility devices paper.

Upload a file

File

VW submission on NTC personal mobility devices paper_final.pdf

Answer questions

Question 1: Are the requirements in the proposed regulatory framework appropriate? Are there any requirements that should be removed, included or modified? Please provide a rationale to support your position No - see submission

Question 4: Do you agree with the criteria selected to assess the options? Are there any key impacts not covered by these criteria? No

Question 5: When considering the safety risk assessment, access and amenity impacts, broader economic impacts, as well as compliance and enforcement impacts; has the impact analysis sufficiently considered all relevant variables and available evidence? What other factors could be included in the analysis? Please provide any additional evidence. (See Appendix E - Impact Analysis No - see submission

Question 6: What do you believe is the most appropriate road infrastructure for PMDs to access: footpaths, separated paths, bicycle paths and/or roads? Please provide a rationale to support your position Separated paths, bicycle paths and roads. See submission for rationale

Question 7: What is an appropriate and safe maximum speed that PMDs should be permitted to travel across the various infrastructure: (a) pedestrian areas, (b) bicycle areas, and (c) roads? Please provide a rationale to support your position A) not at all

Question 8: Do you agree with the overall assessment that Option 3, Speed Approach 1 is the option that best balances mobility and safety? If not, which option and speed approach do you prefer? Please provide a rationale to support your positio No - see submission